Better Communication Training Can Revolutionize Epidemiology

by Jon Scaccia March 6, 2025

A single statistic, taken out of context, can shift healthcare decisions for millions. In the early 2000s, hormone replacement therapy (HRT) for postmenopausal women was thrust under a glaring spotlight. A major trial found small but significant health risks, yet those numbers were presented in ways that seemed alarming without clear explanations of absolute risk. Panic spread, prescriptions plunged, and women in their 40s and 50s—who might have benefited most—were left suffering from challenging menopause symptoms. This communication breakdown didn’t just confuse the public; it had very real consequences for countless lives.

Why Miscommunication Matters

The HRT situation is far from an isolated incident. A similar misstep took place in 1990s England when incomplete warnings about oral contraceptives drove a surge in unintended pregnancies. Later, during the COVID-19 pandemic, shifting and sometimes poorly explained messages about masks, vaccines, and disease risks added fuel to an already blazing debate. Again and again, we see how crucial it is for epidemiologists to share findings with clarity, context, and cultural sensitivity.

But what if these lapses are more than just unfortunate accidents? In truth, many epidemiology training programs focus heavily on data analysis and research design yet offer few opportunities to learn how to reach the public effectively. This gap leaves professionals unprepared to handle the media spotlight or to connect meaningfully with communities—especially those vulnerable to misinformation.

The Call for Epidemiology Communication Training

A wave of public health educators and experts is urging epidemiology programs to make “epidemiology communication training” a standard part of their curricula. Over two decades of studies, forums, and roundtables have highlighted the same urgent need: to teach future epidemiologists how to present data simply, accurately, and ethically to non-scientific audiences.

These efforts underline the same message: We need epidemiologists who can serve as “honest brokers” of health information. This includes not just discussing probabilities but also ensuring that communities with varying literacy levels truly understand the health risks and benefits.

Communication Skills on the Must-Have List

So, what exactly should “epidemiology communication training” involve? Think of these skills as tools every future epidemiologist should carry:

• Communicating Risk and Uncertainty: The public often struggles with probability statements. Simplifying complex data and offering relatable examples can prevent confusion.
• Cultural Awareness and Humility: Building trust in communities—especially those historically marginalized—requires listening as much as speaking.
• Storytelling and Visualization: Facts alone don’t always persuade. Using real-life stories, visuals, and clear graphics can make research findings resonate.
• Social Media Savvy: Countering viral misinformation and disinformation means meeting people where they are—often on digital platforms.
• Active Listening: True communication is a two-way street. Understanding how audiences perceive messages can shape more effective outreach.

Overcoming Obstacles to Curriculum Change

If the value of communication training is so clear, why isn’t it standard? One reason is that graduate programs already have tight course requirements packed with advanced statistical methods and research ethics. Another is the traditional view that communication belongs in the hands of specialized media professionals, not epidemiologists themselves. Yet as news stories keep showing, the public demands direct answers from epidemiologists and will seek them out whether or not these scientists feel prepared.

A second hurdle is that communication skills are best learned through practice, not lectures. Simulated press conferences, role-playing, and interactions with community members can help students learn to navigate difficult conversations. Programs might also form partnerships with journalism or communication schools, allowing students to collaborate on media projects, draft op-eds, or design social media campaigns.

Practical Steps to Move Forward

Training epidemiologists to communicate well does not require a one-size-fits-all solution. Each program could choose the skills that align best with its mission:

• Workshops and Simulations
  Practice sessions with mock interviews or community panels. Faculty or guests can play roles, ask tough questions, and offer real-time feedback.
• Community Partnerships
  Invite local organizations and leaders to advise on effective messaging, ensuring that cultural nuances are respected.
• Collaborations with Communication Experts
  Bring in faculty from journalism or marketing. They can guide students on crafting messages that resonate without compromising scientific integrity.
• Assessment and Feedback
  Students might be graded on how well they translate a technical research finding into a press release or infographic aimed at a general audience.

What’s Next?

The push for “epidemiology communication training” is growing stronger by the day. As misinformation flourishes, epidemiologists have a golden opportunity to step up and become the trusted voices for the public’s needs. Now is the time for academic programs, public health departments, and professional societies to work together on fresh curricula that emphasize both methodologic rigor and strong communication skills.

By embracing this dual mission, our field can empower communities with the information they need to make healthier choices—and help mend the fractures in public trust that every high-profile communication failure has deepened.

Join the Conversation

How do you think we should train the next generation of epidemiologists to handle misinformation? Have you encountered public confusion when sharing research? What communication tools or approaches would help build trust in your own community?

Share your thoughts below or connect with us on social media. Your insights might spark the changes that make all the difference in public health.

Don’t Miss Out – Subscribe Now!

Public health needs your voice today. Join thousands of leaders already making a difference. Subscribe for free to This Week in Public Health and receive weekly updates packed with tools to drive change.
🚨 Urgency matters—take action now and share this blog to expand our reach!