Public Opinion in University Emergencies: The Role of Emotions and Social Media

by Jon Scaccia October 4, 2024

In today’s world, universities are much more than places of learning. They are integral to society, often reflecting broader social issues. However, when emergencies occur on campus, such as mental health crises or safety incidents involving students or teachers, these events can quickly escalate into widespread public concerns. With the rise of social media, these issues often trigger network public opinion—collective sentiments expressed online that can shape both university management and public perception.

A recent study explored how public opinion forms and spreads during university emergencies and what can be done to manage it effectively. It analyzed over 200 real-life cases of university-related incidents, from mental health challenges to teacher-student safety, all of which garnered significant attention online. The findings provide valuable insights for public health practitioners, educators, and researchers about how public discourse on these emergencies evolves and, more importantly, how it can be managed to reduce harm and foster constructive dialogue.

A Web of Public Opinion: The Role of Emotions

One key finding of the study is that emotions play a dominant role in shaping public opinion during university emergencies. Online discussions often reflect strong negative emotions, especially when the incidents involve sensitive topics like student safety or mental health. For example, a student suicide or a case of cyberbullying can lead to an outpouring of anger, fear, and grief on social media platforms like Twitter or Weibo.

This emotional intensity can, in turn, create a feedback loop, where the more people express their feelings online, the more the issue gains traction and spreads. This is especially true during the “diffusion period,” a phase identified in the study where public opinion rapidly escalates, driven by emotional responses from a growing number of social media users. The public’s emotional connection to the issue makes it harder to contain and resolve.

The Lifecycle of Public Opinion

Public opinion doesn’t just appear out of nowhere. The study identified a five-phase lifecycle of how public sentiment develops during university emergencies:

1. Brewing: The issue starts within the university community, often gaining attention in small circles before spreading more widely.
2. Diffusion: As more people become aware of the issue, emotional reactions—often driven by fear or anger—push the topic into the public eye, especially on social media.
3. Outbreak: At this stage, the issue becomes a “storm” of public opinion. Discussions spread rapidly, sometimes out of control, as more users comment, share, and engage with the topic.
4. Dissipation: As university management and other authorities step in to address the situation, public attention gradually begins to wane, and discussions decrease.
5. Calming: The issue eventually fades from public consciousness, with the conversation quieting down as other topics take precedence.

Understanding this lifecycle helps universities and public health practitioners plan their response strategies. For instance, taking proactive steps during the brewing or diffusion phases can prevent a full-blown outbreak. Universities can address concerns early by providing clear, transparent communication and offering support to affected individuals. Waiting too long, however, can result in a situation where emotions are high, and effective intervention becomes much harder.

Key Triggers: Mental Health and Safety

Not all university emergencies garner the same level of public attention. The study found that incidents related to mental health and teacher-student safety are particularly likely to become hot topics online. In fact, these two categories accounted for over 80% of the analyzed cases. This makes sense when you consider the sensitive and personal nature of these issues.

Mental health, for example, is a growing concern on college campuses worldwide. Students face significant pressure, from academic expectations to social challenges, and these stressors can lead to crises that demand public attention. When these events become public knowledge, they strike a chord with a wide audience, many of whom may have experienced similar struggles or know someone who has.

Safety concerns, particularly those involving violence or accidents, also tend to elicit strong emotional responses. Whether it’s a tragic accident or an act of violence on campus, people naturally empathize with the victims, and the sense of injustice or fear these incidents evoke can drive a larger public discussion.

Timing is Everything

Interestingly, the study found that university emergencies are most likely to occur—and receive public attention—during two key times of the year: July and December. These months coincide with high-pressure periods for students, such as final exams, graduations, and admissions. The increased stress during these times can exacerbate tensions on campus, making emergencies more likely.

This finding suggests that universities could be better prepared for emergencies by planning extra support during these months. Increased mental health resources, safety checks, and clear communication with students and faculty could help mitigate the risks.

Strategies for Managing Public Opinion

Given the unpredictable nature of public opinion, how can universities and public health professionals manage it effectively?

1. Early Intervention: Acting during the brewing or diffusion stages is crucial. Universities should be monitoring social media and student sentiment regularly to catch issues before they escalate. By addressing concerns quickly and offering clear communication, they can prevent a situation from spiraling into an outbreak.
2. Collaborative Response: Public opinion isn’t just driven by students or university staff; external stakeholders, including media outlets and advocacy groups, often get involved. Coordinating with these groups can help ensure that the university’s response is seen as credible and empathetic.
3. Transparency and Support: People want to know that universities care about the well-being of their students. Providing mental health support, safety resources, and clear, honest communication about what happened and what’s being done to address the situation can help diffuse negative emotions and build trust.
4. Emotional Awareness: Recognizing that emotions drive much of the public response is key. Universities should not just focus on facts but also address the emotional impact of these incidents. Showing empathy and understanding can go a long way in calming public concerns.

Join the Conversation

• Have you ever witnessed how public opinion shapes the response to a university crisis? What were your impressions?
• What strategies do you think are most effective for managing emotional reactions in times of campus emergencies?

Join the Community – Get Your Weekly Public Health Update!

Be a health leader! Subscribe for free and share this blog to shape the future of public health together. If you liked this blog, please share it! Your referrals help This Week in Public Health reach new readers.