How Accurate Are Your Doctor’s Details?

by Jon Scaccia August 5, 2024

Imagine you’re trying to find a doctor. I mean, you probably don’t have to imagine. I’m sure you’ve done it multiple times.

You look up your health insurer’s provider directory, call the listed number, and it turns out to be wrong. You try another—same issue. Frustrating, right? Unfortunately, this is a common experience for many people.

Recent research has illuminated the alarming inaccuracy of health insurer provider directories, a problem that has real-world consequences for patients and the healthcare system as a whole.

The Problem with Provider Directories

Provider directories are essential tools for patients seeking medical care. They list doctors’ names, addresses, phone numbers, and specialties, helping patients find the right provider within their health insurance network. However, inaccuracies in these directories are rampant. This research examined the consistency of address, phone number, and specialty information for physicians listed in five major U.S. health plan directories.

Out of 634,914 unique physicians in the Medicare Provider Enrollment, Chain, and Ownership System (PECOS) database, 449,282 were found in at least two directories and included in the study. The results were startling. Address consistency ranged from just 16.5% to 27.9%, phone number consistency from 16.0% to 27.4%, and specialty information consistency from 64.2% to 68.0%.

Why Should We Care?

1. Access to Care: Inaccurate directories can make it difficult for patients to find the care they need. Incorrect phone numbers or addresses mean wasted time and delayed treatment.
2. Surprise Bills: Patients might end up seeing a doctor who isn’t actually in their network, leading to unexpected and often hefty medical bills.
3. Health System Planning: Accurate provider directories are crucial for effective health workforce planning. Governments rely on this data to ensure there are enough providers to meet the population’s needs.

Who’s Affected Most?

The study revealed significant variation by physician specialty. General practice, family medicine, plastic surgery, and dermatology had the highest consistency of addresses and phone numbers, whereas anesthesiology, nuclear medicine, radiology, and emergency medicine had the lowest. This suggests that doctors who frequently interact with patients are more likely to keep their information up to date.

Moreover, there was considerable variation by state. For instance, only 13% of physicians in Minnesota had consistent addresses, compared to 47% in Washington, D.C. Similarly, phone number consistency ranged from 6% in North Dakota to 39% in Florida.

The Roots of the Problem

Why is this happening? One major issue is the administrative burden on physician practices to update their information across multiple health insurer directories. Different insurers require information in distinct formats and on different schedules, making it a cumbersome task for doctors and their staff.

Legislative efforts like the No Surprises Act and various state laws have attempted to address this issue, but enforcement has been minimal. The systemic nature of this problem suggests that targeting only insurers is not enough. Both insurers and physician groups need to be engaged in the solution.

Potential Solutions

The research highlights the need for innovative policy solutions. Here are a few ideas:

1. Centralized Provider Directories: A single, centralized system for provider information could reduce the burden on physician practices and improve accuracy. The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services in the U.S. has proposed such a system.
2. National Standards: Creating a national standard for exchanging provider directory information could streamline the process and ensure consistency across states and insurers.
3. Leveraging Technology: Advanced technology and data management systems can play a crucial role in maintaining accurate and up-to-date directories. For example, Australia’s Provider Connect Australia (PCA) is a new initiative aimed at streamlining provider information access.

The Global Perspective

This issue isn’t unique to the U.S. In countries with centralized healthcare systems, like the United Kingdom’s National Health Service, accurate provider directories are vital for workforce planning. However, inaccuracies are still present. Australia’s PCA model is being watched closely as a potential solution.

Join the Conversation

How has your experience been with finding accurate provider information? Have you faced difficulties due to incorrect details in provider directories?

1. Have you ever encountered problems because of inaccurate provider directory information? Share your story.
2. What solutions do you think could help improve the accuracy of healthcare provider directories?

Conclusion

Inaccurate provider directories are more than just a nuisance—they pose a significant barrier to accessing healthcare, can lead to financial surprises, and impede effective health system planning. This research underscores the need for comprehensive solutions that engage both insurers and physician groups to improve the quality of provider information. As legislators and policymakers push for change, innovative and technologically advanced approaches must be considered to ensure patients can reliably find the care they need.

Be Part of the Change – Get Weekly Updates! 

Stay informed and connected. Subscribe for free and share this blog to make a difference in public health with others.