Three Warning Signs the Public Is Losing Sight of Science Cuts

Look, we all know the news cycle is way too fast. Case in point.

Only 63% of Americans now know that federal scientists are being fired, down from nearly 80% just months ago. At a moment when public health and science agencies are facing historic cuts, public attention is slipping fast. Here are the 3 biggest takeaways from a new national survey on what Americans are seeing, feeling, and supporting when it comes to threats to public health and science.

1. Awareness of Science Threats Is Dropping—Fast

Awareness of major federal actions—such as firing scientists, canceling research grants, and halting health data collection—fell by 15–20 percentage points since March 2025. Even highly publicized actions are fading from view.

Democrats remain the most aware, but the drop is happening across all political groups. Even more striking: 15–20% of people say they don’t know whether they’ve heard anything at all.

Why it matters: If people don’t see the threat, they won’t mobilize to protect the agencies that keep vaccines safe, track disease, or fund life-saving research.

2. Many Americans Aren’t Feeling the Impact Yet

Despite sweeping federal actions, relatively few Americans report personal impacts:

• Only 7% experienced a clinical trial disruption.
• 6–10% had trouble accessing vaccines.
• 12% had difficulty getting basic health or science information.

Even with mass federal firings, personal exposure has stayed nearly unchanged since March.

Why it matters: When people don’t feel direct harm, they often assume the system is fine—even when it’s weakening underneath them.

3. Support for Research Cuts Is Low… But So Is Opposition

Across all types of research—medical, basic science, social science, and health equity—only about 30% support cuts. That’s the good news.

The challenge? About one-third neither support nor oppose cuts. They’re simply unsure.

And while some people are willing to sign petitions, few say they’ll take more active steps like contacting officials or attending rallies.

Why it matters: This large “neutral” middle is where public health and science communication can make the biggest difference.

The Big Picture

Americans value science but many don’t yet see how today’s threats could affect tomorrow’s vaccines, treatments, or disaster preparedness. This moment calls for clearer storytelling, stronger public engagement, and messaging that connects science to everyday life.

Which takeaway feels most urgent for your community? Share this post and keep the conversation going.